An Opening of a Dialogue – European Commission Meets Manufacturers

Gasmet is an active participant in the preparation of European standards for emissions monitoring. On the 12th of September, we participated in the first official meeting between the European Commission and European emissions monitoring equipment manufacturers to discuss Directive-level issues. Read what this meeting was all about and what was its outcome.

Meeting with Measurement Equipment Manufacturers

The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED, 2010/75/EU) is the main piece of EU legislation setting the environmental requirements for large industrial installations. One of the key requirements of the IED is for installations to use Best Available Techniques (BAT). In addition to emission limits set in the IED itself, sectoral requirements are established through BAT conclusions which form part of BAT reference documents (BREFs), established by technical working groups. Of particular relevance is the reference document on monitoring which is a reference to enhance the consistent application of BAT conclusions and the IED.

Over time, technical evolution leads to progressively lower associated emission levels being identified, which can result in stricter emission limit values being defined in installation permits.

In regards to this, the European Commission invited European measurement equipment manufacturers to Brussels in order to understand whether the current framework for approval of emissions measuring equipment was working adequately and to ensure that manufacturers have the appropriate conditions to bring equipment to the market. Even though manufacturers play an important role in building emissions monitoring standards, the invite to discuss Directive-level issues was the first of its kind and turned out to be fruitful to all parties involved.

Among the invited manufacturers was Gasmet who was also given the opportunity to prepare a keynote presentation on the barriers to introducing improved techniques. Our representatives in the meeting were Emilia Jyrkiäinen, CEMS Product Manager; Anna Leino, Product Engineer and Rami Vuorinen, Chief Technology Officer.

Over time, technical evolution leads to progressively lower associated emission levels being identified, which can results in stricter emission limit values being defined in installation permits.

The outlined agenda for the meeting was as follows:

  1. The IED, emission monitoring and the role of measurement equipment manufacturers
  2. The role of CEN in measurement instrument certification
  3. Barriers to introducing improved techniques or meeting the needs of specific sectors
  4. Comparison with the situation in jurisdictions outside the EU


Eye-opening Discussions

The meeting was arranged by the Directorate-General for Environment (DG ENV), which is the European Commission department responsible for EU policy on the environment. The day consisted of presentations by the organizer, presentations by manufacturers and open discussions facilitated by the organizer.

The discussions aroused by the presentations were eye-opening and showed that the DG ENV’s understanding of the manufacturer’s role in the legislative process and the actual challenges faced by the manufacturers had some room for improvement. The need to involve manufacturers in the preparation of (emission monitoring) legislation and in the improvement of certification processes was clearly identified.

The need to involve manufacturers in the preparation of (emission monitoring) legislation and in the improvement of certification processes was clearly identified.

All in all, it was apparent that the manufacturers’ point of view had not been considered in the legislative process before. The meeting and the discussions it roused were a needed opening on the matter.


Gasmet’s Findings of the Bottlenecks of the Certification Process

Gasmet was one of two manufacturers to have a presentation at the meeting. We have been acquiring certifications for our products since there have been European standards to emissions monitoring so we have a two-decade history in the certification process. Based on this experience, it was on our agenda to highlight the perceived bottlenecks of the certification process and possible solutions to avoid them.

The main message we wanted to convey was that stricter emission limit values and the needed certification efforts that come with the package are not the main challenges. Instead, challenges are caused by the certification process and the bureaucracy it entails. It might, for example, take us three years to come up with a new product and another three years to get it certified. This makes it extremely hard and slow to bring applicable products to market in time to meet the constantly tightening requirements for emissions monitoring.


Consequently, we suggested the following improvements to the certification process:

  • The transparency of the certification process should be increased
  • The approval process of test reports should become quicker e.g. by increasing the number of occasions per year where the approvals are handled
  • The number of test laboratories with the authority to provide certifications should be increased
  • The ambiguity of European standards should be decreased so that the interpretation of standards can become as concordant as possible

The Opening of a Dialogue

They say it takes two to tango. The certification process and the European legislative process certainly involve more than two dancing partners but we feel that the European Commission meeting with measurement equipment manufacturers was a promising opening of dialogue. It was a great place to learn from each other and to realize that there is a strong need and will for an open and ongoing dialogue between these parties.

We were pleased to see how well the manufacturers’ remarks were received and look forward to seeing if our suggestions are taken into action to improve the certification process. We are also eager to see how well the manufacturers’ point of view is taken into consideration in the legislative process in the future.

The Directorate-General for Environment will now prepare an overview of the presentations and discussions that took place in Brussels. The DG ENV will also determine which matters are under their jurisdiction and can be pushed forward, and which are matters that need to be handled with other departments. But what is the most important, is the fact that the dialogue has now been opened!


If emission monitoring interests you, don’t forget to download our free guide on the topic below:


After reading the handbook, you will be familiar with:

  • Industrial Emissions Monitoring & Suitable Technologies
  • Quality Assurance
  • WI BAT Conclusions for waste incinerators and co-incinerators
  • LCP BAT Conclusions for large combustion plants
  • Gasmet’s Solutions for Emissions Monitoring

Download Emission Monitoring Handbook


Related articles

Continuous Emission Monitoring Ensuring Cleaner Air and Better Safety
UK CEMS II e Increases Flexibility in Continuous Emissions Monitoring
Continuous Mercury Monitoring Requires Reliable and Sensitive Technology


Gasmet Provides Emission Monitoring Solutions for the Following Applications

Waste Incineration
Power Plants
Cement Production
Raw Gas Measurements
Compliance Measurements
Aluminum Production
Fertilizer and Nitric Acid Production

Listing page